Story:
Its 1889 in Vienna, : The Brides of Dracula’s are busy disposing of the lord of darkness by nailing him to the very bottom of his coffin. Flash forward to Los Angeles, curca 1974: we meet an ageing Hollywood starlet decides play one up on the Dracula Brides by accidentally unleashing old Drac back onto the scene .Hapless Crime scene photographer Quincy Harker is the only man who has seen what has gone down, but shocker…wno one believes him. The race is on for the head of Harker as he now has tp contend with a relentless chase from Drac and his brides! Are Dracula’s three brides there to help him… or use him as bait? This pulpy gum shoe, pulse-pounding crime scene graphic novel from the team of ALEX DE CAMPI and ERICA HENDERSON.
The Score Card:
The Writing:
Charlton Hero: Picture yourself for a moment in a writing room. You are tasked with the idea of writing a Dracula story!! Many of us are already invested with just piece of information. I grew up on Marvels horror books and the likes of artist extraordinaire Gene Colon, and such incredible comic writers like Marv Wolfman, Gerry Conway, Archie Goodwin and others whom for most of the seventies nailed down a title called Tomb Of Dracula that was better than any comics fan even deserved at the time. We got the Dracula we knew, The white pasty skin, the cape the slick hair, fangs who was a certifiable lady killer. It was tropey as hell but it was magnificent. He was a good guy, a bad guy but for better or worse he was my Dracula!! Lets fast forward to mark Radulich’s suggestion of doing a modern Dracula book to which I said “Hell yes!!”
Now back to the writing room. Writer Alex de Camp and artist Erica Henderson she of Squirrel Girl and Jughead fame give their “Spin’ on Dracula. Lets stop here for a minute. When I hear the words “Their spin, or Their interpretation” of something I immediately roll my eyes out of an unconscious force of habit burned into me from the movie/ TV industry who like to “Interpret” comics, cartoons in ways I despise (I am talking to YOU ThunderCats Roar and Jem and The Holograms). It seems my instincts were right as this is NOT a classic Drac story…in fact we barely ever see an actual Dracula! No pasty white womanizer here folks instead Dracula is more or less a anime inspired supernatural partition with multiple eyes and a wide brimmed tooth filled mouth that floats around the scenery being sort of spooky but little else. This story is mainly about his three scorned Brides who try to eliminate our fanged anti hero by nailing him into a coffin for eternity in the non-sensicle opening scene.
We flash forward to 70s LA where Dracula is unleashed once again to the world by a Hollywood Starlett with a deathwish to wreak havoc upon Hollywood. Beat Photographer Quincy Harker who is in bed with the authorities is conveniently paying off the police for the prized money shots of LA deaths is dragged into this mess of a story.
This is my long way of saying I didn’t like it. I didn’t get my Dracula, the story meanders all over the place and there are times when you fight to understand what is happening on the page. We are given almost NOTHING about the characters and if you held a gun to my head after reading this book I could tell you two characters that I remembered one being Drak and the other our boy the reporter Quincy!??
Alot of times we lean on the artist to be the extra pencil weaving the story for us but I think this was even too much for our Jughead artist to showcase in a coherent manner on the page. I wont call the writing lazy or even bad its just like that guy who starts a joke in the middle gives you the conclusion without actually letting you know what the heck is going on and laughs at his own punchline and waits for your laughter which never comes because you are utterly lost.
JJG – The story was…interesting. It starts off with what seems to be a pretty standard seedy Hollywood murder story, but that only lasts a few pages. It quickly escalates into a fast paced horror tale that is both strange and beautiful.
I have to admit I read it through pretty quickly and didn’t fully understand what was going on. The dialog is pretty minimal and there is little to no exposition. I went back and looked through it a second time and was able to grasp it a little better. It is the kind of story that much of what is happening is told through the art as well as the writing. The writer and artist had to work closely together to tell the tale. In reading the notes from both de Campi and Henderson it is pretty clear that is exactly what happened.
This kind of storytelling can be difficult to pull off, but they did it here. The story is a fun tale that is thrilling and dramatic. It is also the type of story that I consider to be a “real” graphic novel. Now-a-days the term graphic novel is used to refer to original stories in one volume as well as trade paperback collection. To me those are two different things and this is a graphic novel. It is a story that needs to be told in a more prestigious format than a 28 page staple bound comic.
Mark Radulich – This could have been so much more. The idea of dracula stalking seventies LA seemed delicious to me. Sadly, after a page or 2 they walk away from the natural setting and it becomes a horror-revenge-kill dracula type of deal. Money was left on the table – there’s no depth here. What we got was just OK but it could have been fleshed out so much more. I’ll echo the previous statement, the story is told in the art and it might take multiple “reads” to really get that. It probably lends itself more to a film format than a graphic novel. I’m the type of guy who should be doing flips for a book called Dracula Motherfucker but there’s just not enough here. I am disappointed.
The Art:
Charlton Hero: I started my review with a sucker punch on the writing but I will offer some amends with a favorable note on the artwork. It is decent. Yup…decent. The real strength of the work is the coloring and the mood which masks any flaws in the art. The main characters are not drawn in rich detail but they are made beautiful with very scene specific color pallets which honestly makes the book visibly amazing if I am being honest. If you peel back the color the art is serviceable, you add the flavor and we have fine dining here. Any of these pages colored would make great pieces of art on their own so hats off to artist Erica Henderson but she owes half or more of her haul on this book to the colorist…which is also so good on her! A Lot of what we see if mood driven. Some of the page layouts do not even make sense in the narrative but are only on the page to set mood, and tone which is super effective yet loosely abstract.
I know..I always associate the term “abstract” in a comic book as laziness but I dont feel thats the case here. Settings, props and vehicular details are very strong but the characters that live in the environment are loose and at times downright cartoony…but it works. The artist uses mood lighting and different shades of color to reflect time differences and shades of night and day and it is very well done.
Now…on to the bad. The book is such a quick read that many times we are given art and visuals for the sake of filling a page. On one two page spread for example we get a car, a building, a stack of magazines, street lights, and a phone booth…and nothing else. Many times I am wondering why is this here? What is being said? I tend to roll the blame on the writer as the art is striking and detailed but saying not a heck of a lot. Then there is Dracula.
Clearly someone watches anime and likes to take their cues from japanese Horror as Dracula is not the Romanian lust filled Vampire prince we know but rather a faceless of a monster. He has no true form but is just there?? I get we want to do something different…thats great but for a scene or two give me the damn guy in the cape.
JJG – The art is the real highlight of Dracula Motherf**cker. It is beautiful, colorful, and covers the pages in such a way as to keep the reader engaged and turning the pages quickly. The colors are bright when they need to be and subtle when they need to be. It is clear that everything that happens is at night in this comic, and yet none of the characters or action is obscured by heavy inks or shadows.
This is not a gory story, but the violence of the vampires is understood. There are plenty of dead bodies but there isn’t a lot of blood and guts. The horror is abstract at times but it fits well. Dracula is portrayed as a multi-eyed, mostly shapeless form. Only his arms are shown in detail a couple of times. It is a pretty cool way to depict a familiar character. In the notes that follow the story they talk about how they did not want to do a standard gothic tale that has been done plenty of times before and it works.
Mark Radulich – The art is pretty. It’s a very colorful book – in an abstract kind of way. It reminded me of the show Legion or parts of the Doctor Strange movie. Really the art is the best part of the book. Most of the pages look like paintings you could hang on a wall in your home.
The Characters:
Charlton Hero- This book character wise is a one trick pony. Photographer Quincy Harker is the ONLY character that we get enough discourse on to discuss development. Quincy is a beat photographer who is playing pool with the police to get the exclusive on LA’s biggest crime scenes. It is an understanding that when something major happens in the city Harker gets the call and he sweeps in before anyone else gets the jump and grabs the money shots! He falls into hands of the brides of Dracula and is stalked by the disembodied entity of our favorite vampire. He doesn’t seem sleazy in anyways despite being on the take with the police. In fact you don’t really get much of anything in the way of motivation. We know he likes money and doesn’t really get scared much and throws himself into the worst kind of situations. He is attacked by the entity that is Dracula and is saved by a unnamed girl to which he proclaims “I am just a photographer, I just take photos!!” The girl who saved him notes “No Newsboy…NOW you’re a headline!!!” THis rings true because this story is all Quincy. My issue is that he is not particularly interesting nor do we know why he is being tracked by Dracula and his gang outside of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. He is abducted for no real reason by Dracula’s brides who seem to not have a plan for him either outside of fighting between each other for him!!??
The Brides are an interesting case study as well!!
JJG – The story is short and there is very little character development. It focuses on the familiar Dracula tale and tries to put a new spin on it without rehashing all the elements that usually get told. There is no Renfield, or visit to Dracula’s castle. No journey of Dracula’s coffin across the sea. No origin tale. There is the Harker character who is more of a pawn than anything. There is Bebe, the new bride. Dracula, and finally the new and old brides, none of whom are named that I caught and there is no backstory to any of them.
Mark Radulich – The only character we really get to know is Harker. He’s a photographer seemingly struggling with his hustle and through no fault of his own gets mixed up with Dracula and his brides. He’s kind of a dupe. He seems alright. I wish he had been more sleezy or something. Anything to give him more depth. The characters are indicative of everything wrong with this book – it’s an idea with half pregnant execution. It’s an outline of a story – not a fully developed story and the characters are literally sketches – not fully formed people inhabiting a developed world telling a fully developed story.
Criticisms:
JJG – While I enjoyed this very much, it feels like an introduction. It is a quick story that ends with Harker becoming a vampire and him waking up with the three former brides welcoming him to the undead club. It is like a set up for the further adventures of “Harker’s Angels”. The story goes by so fast it leaves me wanting more, which is both good and bad. I feel like this story could have had the characters fleshed out a bit more. We could learn more about the former brides. There could be more about Harker and what led him to his life of night time ambulance chasing. I was left wanting something to make this feel more like a full meal than a hearty appetizer.
Mark Radulich – This is a pitch, not a fully formed finished product. It’s like a collection of storyboards an ad executive would bring to a meeting to sell a product. This could have been set anywhere at any time. Nobody is making use of the gritty 70’s LA scene. Harker is practically a blank slate. The story moves so quick from intro to horror to conclusion that it give the reader whiplash. I needed more. I’m left with literary blue balls.
Charlton Hero- I have seen books that go out of their way to be art rather than substance…this is one of them. This is a book that is very “Good Looking” but literally has no teeth. Pardon the pun. Its too weird to be enjoyable and too light to be a good read. Who is the audience here? I am obviously not into this version of Dracula but I just feel there is just too much left on the table here. We literally knew nothing about the characters. This is part one of a 6 part mini series that never existed nor do I want to read anymore.
Overall Thoughts:
JJG – Dracula Motherf**ker is a fun read and very different take on a familiar story. The collaboration between writer and artist is amazing. The pages are beautiful. The story is concise and well done. I’d love to see more from de Campi and Henderson and more of the former brides of Dracula and their exploits. I’d recommend this to anyone who likes horror comics and might enjoy an updated take on a classic.
Mark Radulich – I wanted Blackula! I was promised “A pulpy, pulse-pounding graphic novel of California psych-horror. What I got was shallow and poorly thought out horror version of the Simpsons episode, “The Mysterious Voyage of Homer” (which I enjoyed a lot more than this). I think I’m just mad because I wanted to enjoy this so much more. It had all the potential. What I got was a little bit of sizzle and barely any steak. I is a sad panda.
Charlton Hero – Nail me to a coffin. I am done. I am let down by lack of substance here. Its actually an overly lite graphic novel that leaves you going “Wuh”? Can I recommend this book? Yes!! I recommend you don’t buy it. No knock on the creators as I am sure this was a time consuming book to produce and it sure was pretty but its one girl I am leaving at the dance. Its a no for me.
End:
Members Links/Social Media:
JJG – https://comicscomicscomics.blog Twitter @bigox737
Charlton Hero: Blog: The Superhero Satellite: www.charltonhero.wordpress.com Twitter: @Charlton_Hero
Mark Radulich: Podcasts: https://w2mnet.com/ Twitter: @markradulich









